top of page

Rethinking Reference Checks: Are They Really Worth It?


A professional man wearing glasses is engaged in a conversation over the phone, sitting at his office desk surrounded by various work items and a computer monitor, with blinds partially drawn in the background.

You know the drill: you're hiring, you've got a promising candidate, and it's time to do a reference check because... that's just what you do, right? Well, let's hit pause on that thought. It turns out reference checks might not be the golden ticket we've all been told they are.


The Reference Check Mirage: Unmasking Hidden Biases

Consider this: when candidates hand-pick their cheerleaders for references, it's no surprise we get rave reviews. But let's be real—it's more about who you know than what you know. This isn't networking; it's stacking the deck.


Who's On the Line?

Ever play that game where you have to guess who's calling you without caller ID? That's reference checks in a nutshell. You're taking a leap of faith that the person on the other end is who they say they are. Not exactly reassuring.


Scripted Applause

Nowadays, candidates coach their references like they're headed for Broadway. So, what we get is less of an honest opinion and more of a well-rehearsed show. Not quite the authenticity we're looking for.


The "Say the Least" Policy

And let's not forget the companies that, scared of legal backlash, have zipped it tight. They'll confirm the job title and dates, and that's it. Talk about bare bones.


Turnover Tells a Different Story

Now, if reference checks were the ace in the hole for hiring, we’d have to squint to find turnover stats. But guess what? People still leave jobs, sometimes quicker than it takes for their welcome plant to wilt. So, what gives? You get these references painting candidates as the next best thing since sliced bread, yet down the line, there’s a mismatch, and they’re out the door. It makes you question if those glowing endorsements were more about avoiding awkwardness or potential legal snags than giving the real scoop. The truth is, even with the best references, there’s no guarantee of longevity or fit. It suggests that the reference check, as it stands, might not be the crystal ball we hope it to be when it comes to predicting employee success and retention.


Recap: The Real MVP Is The Interview

So, let's not beat around the bush. Reference checks have their place—maybe in the past. They’re a formality that’s losing steam, and for good reason. They can be misleading, filled with bias, and let’s be honest, a bit of a gamble on authenticity. Meanwhile, the interview is where the magic happens. It's our chance to really connect with candidates, get a sense of their thinking, and see if there's that spark of alignment with our team. If we want to cut down on turnover and find people who stick around longer than it takes to learn everyone's coffee orders, it's time to focus on the interactions that matter. Let’s save our time and put our trust in the parts of the hiring process that truly reveal a candidate's potential to thrive long-term in our organizations.

bottom of page